Sonntag, 25. Juli 2010

About the Realm of Realities

Reality is no shared good. Common sense - but I had forgotten about it. Welcome to reality's personal reality.

Reality is born within perception. Reality is a product of consciousness and as such a very intimate matter.

One Friday night. One room. And within its four walls we are all alive at the same time. The music that is blaring out of the speakers and finds its way into our ears is the same - but what is heard varies from ear to ear. While the Cure's Close to Me provokes melancholy in hers, he might relive a happy moment while the notes jump from one to the next.

And it is not only the music that is read, interpreted and felt in as many different ways as there are people in the room but everything around it. An outside observer might see one obvious storyline - a party. But in the inside every single mind is taking part in his or her own little play on his or her own stage of the night. The backdrop has been drawn by the individual's cognitive consciousness as well as expectance and expectations. The props are supplied by the intersection we share: time.

So, while our independant spectator watches us falling from the edges of our glasses and bathing in the alluring and blurring liquid of socialisation, and wile he watches this one overall party story, a thousand self-contained stories are going on with every participating party of the party.

And even within an actual cohesive bubble of a conversation two realities are being built because words are words, sentences are sentences and the sender and recipient don't share the origins of the latter. So, when his words make perfect sense to himself while they roll out of his high-spirited mouth, his listener's ears interpret them with the instrument of her tipsy reasoning. The chain of thoughts and emotions that have led to the speaker's words, however, are unknown to her. All that she holds in her receiving and construeing hands, is the essence of his thoughts - even if it is the nonsensical champagne speaking out of him. No thoughts. No sense. No significance. But still reveived and absorbed.

In the morning we wake up with roaring heads and resounding pieces of conversations in our ears, that in their incoherence and contextlessness leave nothing but an upleasant and awkward taste on our tongues.

We swallow some painkillers, take a shower and have a coffee to increase the space between yesterday's heard and said and today's hungover reality. And slowly within the course of the day we pull ourselves out of the fake intimicacies and familiarities that were created the night before, and we dive deep back into the sincerity of daylight.

During the aftermaths and several up-catching phone-calls later we discover that the story our perception of the party wrote differs significantly from the others'. While I was sitting in the kitchen trying hard to mingle, you saw me distancing.

While I was fighting against the sparkling fizzes in my feasting head, your head was already looking for another purple fizz to enter into yet another level of reality.

While The Kinks hijacked me into my past, you were dancing against the backdrop of your past-less musical stage creating your own commemerative synapsis for the song.

But as long as we meet on Sunday and throw all our tiny stories into one big pot, the awkward taste will dissolve into a funny collective memory - even if we stumble across some misunderstandings and clashing perceptions. So, come on, dear friends, lets revel on and build one common and illustrious saga of the summer of 2010.


2 Kommentare:

  1. This is a great piece! Can two persons ever really understand each other? You seem to say no: Against the (unique) backdrop of our past and present consciousness, words and action mean different things to different people, they live in literally different realities, the intimacies are fake.

    So here comes advocatus diaboli: 1. The meaning of a word consists in its use, the inferences it enables. 2. Theoretically, meanings are infinite. Practically, some are salient. Actually, one is chosen. 3. Socialization and context allow the listener to rule out most of the unchosen ones. Empathy and unstrategic questions help translate for oneself and gain confidence in the most plausible interpretation. 4. What remains may be short-lived, but not fake. It may remain a partial fusion of horizons, but a fusion nonetheless. 5. We must not set the standard for understanding so high that only reliving the others neuronal experience counts as success. Otherwise, the ordinary magic of two people connecting risks becoming the victim of the onslaught of scepticism.

    And this is the provocative question: In the politics of art, should we foreground and praise the seriously best the reality of social relating has to offer, or emphasize in which respects it falls short of making two people identical in what they take away from their moment?

    AntwortenLöschen
  2. Thanks for that one. Well, me in my non-writing capacity believe that reality is everything that happens beyond interpretation. But I also think, that everyone should make a million things out of it. Certain levels of reality should be self-created with the tools and instruments of perception, consciousness and interpretation. The drama-queens among us are the masters of this art. The perception of reality can be changed with the blink of an eye. Be reality as it may, it is for us to read it and create it in whatever we want it to be - and I won't mention the value system that should be the footing of it all at this point.. The empathetic ones among us, the ones that are able to change perspectives are the ones that manage to observe one reality from several perspectives. An inspiring talent. And a lovely attribute nevertheless. If we add communication and share the perceived, if we bury the abnormal aspiration to merge into one piece with our counterparts and hold them at a healthy arm's length instead, wounded vanities and boredom shall sleep forever. I think. I think.

    AntwortenLöschen