Today a most curious critic darted a very sharp arrow at my playful me. I dodged it with the greatest agility I could grind out of my astonishment but the spearhead of his accusation left a pringly point on my neck nevertheless.
He, the critic, called me a phantom-hunter who willfully misses her target for the sake of inspiration.
Before I start to dismantle this allegation, I want to highlight, however, that it will stay unclear in how far the person that is wielding the defensive pen here might weaponise the artistic licence solely for the matter itself - Ars gratia Artis.
Coming back to the phantom, I have to confess that in a way you, dear Critic, may be more right than you imagine but on a level of a different kind.
Yes, I hunt phantoms, and when I catch them, I dress them and I colour them. I feed them and I starve them. I tame them and I drop them. I squeeze the last drop of inspiration out of my phantoms - whatever they may be, a song, a story, a film, a play, a journey, a painting or a daydream. And yes, it is true, I don't want to bring down my phantoms and keep them. Most of them are straw fires, and apart from me being entirely left-handed when it comes to making a fire, I am also far away from being a gatherer.
But that's about it. Your phantom-theory comes to an end at this point.
Since I know that your metaphor was aiming at a human exegisis, I will do you the favour and defend myself in the court of creativity. But I will whisper and hum.
And I will only say it once: I never dress human beings in a phantom's gown; they are my muses without the intention of sounding dramatic. Human beings' actions are entirely detached from my phantasy. People do inspire but beyond my sphere of influence. In some rare occasions they say and think such precious things that I would love to put their words in a matchbox and carry them around with me every single day. "Her flat is utterly beautiful, and so are her stories" - how could my poor phantasy ever put such fine words into a phantom's mouth? Or a speaking acquaintance whose eyes start to gleam when he talks about ions? Or the friend of a friend who figures me out within a split second, and I can tell by this one simple and still genial question he asks? Or the stranger who goes on about the difference between techno and electronics without knowning that this sermon is usually preached by me? Or the people you can hang out with for days and days without moving one unknown synapse of your brain, and still you won't stumble across boredom or peevishness?
How could I label them as phantoms?
So, yes, maybe I hunt phantoms to inspire myself - but to euphemise it a little, maybe I find inspiration in everything in front of me. Maybe it is a good thing to read colours into plain things and to look for layers in unidimensional objects? And maybe it is a good things to dream in colour when reality serves 214 shades of grey and as such 16384 nuances between black and white?
And maybe it is a good thing to browse for one song that carries that certain something for hours and hours instead of listening to old stuff without hearing something that connects to new places within myself?
How could I plead not guilty when your accusation of being a phantom-hunter means that I am tracing epiphanies? I hereby declare under oath that there is no greater good than inspiration for me as a writer, and for me as an adventurer.
And now, I will retire and polish my shotgun. But before I do so, dear Critic, I shall note that the sweet pain of inspiration that your arrow left is now ceasing and that you were my muse for one hour and a half - nolens volens. I hope Calliope's wreath suits you - be it braided from yellow or white lilies. This determinant detail shall remain my secret.
And the rest is silence.
"Chance is always powerful. Let your hook be always cast; in the pool where you least expect it, there will be a fish." ~ Ovid